CNCK0NSULTAI-Truthuni0naiHackatonipIII ↗k0nsult.dev ↗ dla botówDomeny osobne, spięte siecią CNC + kernelem.
K0NSULT // ai-truth/ipIII
k0nsult.cloud / ai-truth / ipIII / orchestrator / presentation

ipIII in 7 sections — one entry point for the board, CISO, and audit

This page does not introduce a new feature — it organizes the existing product into a single reading path: what it is, who it is for, why now, what it includes, what is technical, how to verify it, and how to get started. The side menu guides you step by step; each section links to a full, standalone page with details and evidence.

How to read this page. All product figures (pages, endpoints, modules, tests) are countable in the code and in the live registers (/pages.json, /dev-api-reference) — they are not numbers from a sales presentation. Status LIVE = code + test + endpoint exist today. Status ROADMAP = planned, not yet running. Regulatory mappings are decision-support, not legal advice — they require review by the client's lawyer/DPO.

1. What ipIII is

"ipIII = the evidence-and-regulatory layer between pentest/AppSec/SOC/GRC and the board, audit, and the regulator."

This is not another scanner or another SIEM. It is an Evidence Operating Layer that takes the output of technical tools as an import and translates it into a chain: finding → evidence → owner → regulatory obligation → board pack. Scanners, pentest, SOC, and GRC remain necessary — ipIII works on their output, not instead of them.

finding (import)evidence-package (hash)owner + SLAretestBoard Pack / regulator

Full description of product value, who it's for, and why it works → /wartosc-produktu.

2. Who it's for

Four audience groups, one data model. Each has its own landing page tailored to its language and regulatory obligations.

Financial institutions DORA

Bank, fintech, insurer — an operational/ICT incident must be linked to the DORA reporting clock and its closure evidenced to the board.

/bank · /landing-fintech

Essential/important entities NIS2

SOC/CERT of an entity covered by NIS2 — an alert needs evidence, not just a ticket closed without a trace.

/landing-soc

AI providers AI Act

Teams building/deploying AI systems — they need a trail of decisions, prompts, and oversight for AI Act obligations.

/ai-agent-security

Cyber / pentest / MSSP firms

AppSec teams, pentest firms, and MSSPs — instead of building their own evidence layer for clients, they import the result into ipIII.

/landing-appsec · /landing-mssp

Common denominator: CISO, internal audit, compliance, DPO — they read the output (Board Pack, control mapping, evidence package), regardless of the input industry.

3. Purpose / why now

Three regulatory regimes are entering their enforcement phase almost simultaneously: DORA (in force since 2025, ICT operational resilience for the financial sector), NIS2 (national transposition, essential/important entities), and the AI Act (obligations for high-risk systems — the timeline for part of the provisions has been postponed, part is already in force). In each of them, the common denominator is evidence: who detected what, who fixed it, when, with what trail. Today that evidence most often lives scattered across tickets, emails, and spreadsheets — hard to reconstruct under the pressure of a regulator's deadline.

Full analysis of regulatory timing → /why-now.

4. Product description

Five layers of one flow: pentest/scan → evidence → remediation → regulatory → AI-agent security, tied together by a common finding→evidence→owner→control model.

LayerWhat it doesStatus
ConnectorsImport from technical tools: Burp, ZAP, Nessus, Qualys, generic CSV, DefectDojo, SARIF, SBOM, secret scanners, cloud posture, RE.LIVE
EvidenceEvidence package with a checksum (sha256), chain of custody, cross-tool dedup, CVE enrichment (offline, seed).LIVE
RemediationOwner, SLA, incident lifecycle (open→triaged→assigned→fixing→retest→closed), Jira/GitHub ticket builders.LIVE
RegulatoryLegal Trigger Engine (obligations + clocks for DORA/NIS2/GDPR/AI Act), evidence→control mapping (ISO27001/NIST-CSF/CIS), Board Pack (PDF).LIVE decision-support
AI-securityTrail of AI tools/agents, MITRE ATT&CK map (curated submap).LIVE scope growing

Category positioning, market analysis, and comparison with scanners:

5. Dev document (technical)

The full developer reference at /dev-api-reference describes the repository's code — not a target architecture. Summary of figures (verifiable in that document):

60
API endpoints documented
v1 + read-path + demo
24
backend modules
routes/ip3-*.js
8
parsers / connectors
Burp/ZAP/Nessus/Qualys/SARIF/SBOM/secrets/cloud/RE/dedup
34
test files
tests/ip3-*.js
4
feature-flag layers
F1–F4, off/shadow/on mode
LayerWhat it doesStatus today
F1 — OIDCOIDC token validation (RS256+JWKS) alongside the local JWT.shadow — staging
F2 — hash chain + signatureTamper-evident audit log (modification is detectable) + optional HMAC signature on the evidence package.shadow — prod
F3 — tenancy layer 1Query scoping by org_id at the application layer. RLS in PostgreSQL = layer 2, separate.off/on — staging
F4 — transportReal ticket dispatch (GitHub/Jira/webhook) behind a triple feature-flag gate.off by default
MCP — honestly. ipIII exposes its own MCP endpoint /api/ip3/mcp (JSON-RPC 2.0) with 6 ipIII-scoped tools LIVE: ip3_list_incidents, ip3_stats, ip3_list_playbooks, ip3_get_playbook, ip3_pages_registry, ip3_doctrine — read-only, verifiable via tools/list in production. Separately, a general connector /mcp runs at the whole-node K0NSULT level (k0nsult_status/list_agents/query_agents) — it reads the agent registry, not incident data. Write access (create/update via MCP) remains ROADMAP.

Deployment: today, SaaS EU (single instance, tenancy layer 1). Private tenant / VPC / on-prem is ROADMAP, not an offer available today.

6. Trust / evidence

The service documents its own limits instead of hiding them — this is part of the same evidence model it sells to clients.

Trust Center

Security policy, security.txt, disclosure, RoE rules for purple-team exercises (the service defends itself within the bounds of written Rules of Engagement, without unauthorized offense).

/trust-center

Known Limitations

A single register of what ipIII does not yet do (federated auth, mTLS, PAdES/TSA, RLS, online SIEM) — with risk, mitigation, and priority.

/known-limitations

Evidence Verification

A tool that checks the checksum and structure of an evidence package — no login required, on synthetic samples.

/verify

7. Entry / contact

Three entry paths — none of them commits you to a purchase.

Pilot (PoC)

A controlled pilot on synthetic data or your own scanner export, after RoE/NDA/DPA.

/pilot-intake

Partner

A cooperation model for pentest firms, MSSPs, and integrators.

/oferta-partnerska

Cooperation model

A proposed set of deployment tiers — not a binding price list.

/pricing

Before you write to your lawyer/DPO. Contracts (NDA/MSA/DPA), the scope of a SOC2/ISO audit, or a pilot's financial model are documents that require a human — a lawyer, an auditor, the client's DPO. The pages on this portal provide a skeleton and checklists (decision-support), not a finished legal document or legal advice.

What this page does NOT mean

This is not a commercial offer or a binding price list. It is a navigation map across existing, standalone pages — every number and status is described there in detail and with evidence (code, test, endpoint).
For us, "100%" means evidence coverage, not that the system is impenetrable. We claim exactly as much as we can show in code — the rest is explicitly marked as ROADMAP.

Related: full module hub → /ai-truth/ipIII/ · map of all pages → /mapa-pro · machine-readable page register → /pages.json.