K0NSULT // ai-truth/ranking-jst-kas · EN
k0nsult.cloud / ai-truth / ranking-jst-kas / en

Ranking — local government (JST) / KAS

Monitoring of artificial-intelligence implementations in local government units (JST) and the National Revenue Administration (KAS). We present only source-confirmed entries — backed by an internal act, an official document or a public announcement. Data from the K0NSULT monitoring spreadsheet (2026). Entries without hard evidence are marked as GAP — they are not conjecture.

not a certification · not a notified body · not a legal conclusion
Research material. It does not constitute a certification, a conformity assessment by a notified body, or a binding legal opinion. The roles and legal bases indicated require evidentiary verification.

JST / KAS — implementation monitoring (source-confirmed entries)

Status: DATA  |  source-confirmed entries: 17 (out of 304 entries in the monitoring spreadsheet).

UnitVoivodeshipTool / AIImplementation statusDateSource
Marshal's Office of the Podlaskie Voivodeship in BiałystokpodlaskieRules for using AI toolsinternal procedure in force2025-09-04BIP Podlaskie - Ordinance 124/2025
Municipal Office in MieroszówdolnośląskieProcedure for using artificial-intelligence toolsinternal procedure in force2025-10-06BIP Mieroszów - Ordinance 194/2025
City Office of Inowrocławkujawsko-pomorskieRules for using AI-based toolsinternal procedure in force2026-01-05BIP Inowrocław - Ordinance 1/2026
City Office of LesznowielkopolskieRules for using AI-based toolsinternal procedure in force2026-04-01BIP Leszno - Ordinance K/01/04/2026
Municipal Office in GłuszycadolnośląskieProcedure for using AIinternal procedure in force2025-09-29BIP Głuszyca - Ordinance 149/O/2025
Commune Office of PszczółkipomorskieRules/principles for using AI toolsinternal procedure in force2026-02-19BIP Pszczółki - Ordinance 8/26
Commune Office of RokietnicawielkopolskiePrinciples for the safe use of AI solutionsinternal procedure in force2025BIP Rokietnica - Ordinance 25/2025
Commune Office of Izbica Kujawskakujawsko-pomorskieProcedure for using AIinternal procedure in force2026-05-04BIP Izbica Kujawska - Ordinance 178/2026
Municipal Office in NałęczówlubelskieProcedure for using artificial-intelligence toolsinternal procedure in force2025-10-31BIP Nałęczów - Ordinance 174/2025
City of Poznań / City Office of PoznańwielkopolskieTeam for the competence network on AI usegovernance/competences - team appointed2025-03-14BIP Poznań - Ordinance 12/2025/K
Marshal's Office of the Lubuskie VoivodeshiplubuskiePLLuM as an administrative assistantpilot / pilot deployment2025-05PAP - Impact 2025 / PLLuM
City of CzęstochowaśląskiePLLuM in local-government administrationpilot announced / being launched2025-08Podatki.biz / Dobreprogramy on the PLLuM pilot
Upper Silesian-Zagłębie Metropolis (GZM)śląskieGZM Algorithm - strategy/report, potential metropolitan chatbot/assistantstrategy/concept2026-02-05GZM Algorithm Report
Ministry of Digital Affairs / AI.gov.plall of PolandGuide to AI for public administration and trainingguidelines/training2026-03AI.gov.pl - guide for the administration
National Revenue Administration (KAS) / e-Tax Officeall of PolandChatbot in the e-Tax Officeplanned implementation2025-03-31Gov.pl KAS - e-service implementation plans
Ministry of Finance / KASall of PolandAI development policy in the MF and KAS / AI documentation and legal actsorganisational/staffing governance2025-10-29KPRM recruitment - chief specialist AI MF
National Revenue Administration (KAS)all of PolandAnalytical tools / risk profiling, ARANEA/STIR/JPK - requires confirmation via a DIP requestuse of analytics - publicly signalled2025LTCA / media on ARANEA

Source: monitoring_ai_jst_kas_2026.xlsx (sheet "Monitoring_AI", 2026). Only rows categorised as "CONFIRMED/SOURCE-BACKED" are shown — backed by an internal act, an official document or a public announcement.

Remaining monitoring-spreadsheet entries = GAP (to be verified). The spreadsheet additionally contains 224 entries in "MONITORING MATRIX" mode (control BIP/media queries without confirmation, status "not assessed — no source document"), 58 "FINANCE/KAS" entries and 5 "CONTEXT/REFERENCES" entries. These are not treated as confirmed implementations — they require a freedom-of-information (public information access, DIP) request or a BIP query. In line with the claim≤proof principle, we do not present them as facts.

Status legend