A working picture of wave connects: how central and local bodies, regulatory sandboxes and one European uni0nai system link into a single, synchronised circuit — self-regulation (bodies and agents regulate themselves) complemented by co-regulation (together with the regulator). This is the ENVOIS 3.0 frame, not a declaration of conformity.
An illustrative schematic. Waves (SVG curves) flow from the layers of central and local bodies, through regulatory sandboxes, into one uni0nai system. Each wave is a different circuit process.
Illustrative schematic (static + CSS animation). It does not reflect individual decisions of any authority; it describes the connect circuit frame within uni0nai.
What each layer brings to the circuit and which process it runs. Status = degree of documentation in the evidence layer.
| Layer | Competency | Action | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central bodies | Oversight, register, interpretation, selection for inspection | Maintaining the AI-system register, supervising conformity, institutional correspondence | DATA |
| Local bodies | Deployment, procedure, citizen service | Using AI in public services, internal procedures, documenting decisions | DATA |
| Regulatory sandbox | Testing, audit, controlled deployment | Trials in a supervised environment, evidence bundles (proof-pack), review with the regulator | SOON |
| uni0nai | Synchronisation, governance, evidence layer | Shared DID, shared scoring, shared evidence trail; binding the layers into one circuit | LIVE |
Divergences between layers are recorded as observations, not accusations. Each is a hypothesis to be verified — in line with claim ≤ proof. No proof = GAP.
| Area | Observed divergence | Effect on the circuit | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pace of readiness | Central bodies are expected to be ready earlier than market and local actors — different timelines. | Asynchrony: layers plug into the connect at different times. | GAP |
| Audit vs procedure | Local government builds deployment procedures, but without a parallel, independent audit. | A procedure without an evidence trail is hard to synchronise. | GAP |
| Unified register | No single, coherent register of AI systems covering both central and local levels. | Data fragmentation — the connect waves lack a common reference point. | GAP |
| Variable communication speed | Correspondence between bodies "circulates" (e.g. DPA → RCL → MoDA) before reaching the addressee. | The communication wave is stretched; it delays deployment and audit. | GAP |
| No shared identity | Systems and operators lack a common identifier (DID) across layers. | A coherent attribution of accountability and scoring is impossible. | GAP |
uni0nai does not replace the authorities. It gives them a shared configuration of the circuit, so that the layers speak one language of evidence. The process operates on every plane at once: self-regulation (bodies and agents regulate themselves) + co-regulation (jointly with the regulator).
One identity for a system/operator across the whole circuit — accountability can be attributed between layers.
One readiness and trust scale — comparable for central, local and sandbox levels.
Every action leaves a trail (evidence layer); audit and synchronisation draw from the same source.
Audit, deployment, communication and synchronisation are defined once and consistent across all layers.
SELF-REGULATION bodies and agents configure their own processes (register, procedure, kill-switch, human oversight) and leave their own evidence trail.
CO-REGULATION the regulator enters through the sandbox — reviews the proof-pack, approves patterns, corrects the configuration. Synchronisation is two-way.
How an action flows through the connect waves — from plugging a layer in to synchronisation in uni0nai.
The full programme picture: /ai-truth/piaskownica · /ai-truth/regulatorzy-eu · /ai-truth/wdrozenia · /ai-truth/indeks · PL original